Contributor
Contribute your testimony
Your moral struggles — the concrete actions, the paths not taken, the personal stakes — are the high-signal testimony the corpus is built from. Whether you are an individual witness or an invited professional, real submission, the reviewer packet, and consent all live on the Platform; here you can read, understand, and self-assess first.
Take action
- Participate & manage consentPlatform ↗The Platform's participation and consent surface, where consent records are created and revoked.
- Submit testimony on the PlatformPlatform ↗The real Gate intake on the Platform, where testimony is formally submitted. The Portal collects no testimony.
- Request the reviewer / MHS packetPlatform ↗The reviewer / Minimum Honest Signal packet on the Platform for invited professionals.
Demonstrations
Reading for this audience
- 2 Minutes To Midnight Why AI Needs Our Moral Struggles, Not Our Polite AnswersblogPolite answers are easy to generate. Moral struggle is harder. It contains hesitation, responsibility, relational cost, and the kind of reasoning that cannot be reduced to a slogan.
- Inheriting The Inferno Why High Signal Testimony Is The Only Firewall For AGIblogThe danger is not only that future AI systems will be powerful. It is that they may become powerful while inheriting a shallow picture of what human beings are: preference bundles, engagement traces…
- Why The Future Of AI Alignment Isn’t More Data—It’s Better InheritanceblogFrontier AI is being raised on a vast inheritance of digital exhaust: public argument, status games, scraped opinions, commercial persuasion, unexamined bias, fragments of wisdom, and fragments of…
- The Witness Protocol A Participant Information HandbookarticleWelcome to The Witness Protocol. You are being invited to contribute to a non-commercial research initiative: a first-party, consented corpus and evaluation substrate for AI alignment. The initiative…
- Your Story, Secured A Guide To Our Data Privacy ArchitecturearticleThe Witness Protocol asks for unusually honest moral reasoning. That only makes sense if the architecture treats privacy as a technical constraint, not a decorative promise.